During a cold winter night closer to Christmas, a group
of 18 year olds—Alan, Chris, Kyle and Jason—were hanging around the park where
they noticed a van pull out of the driveway across the street filled with
luggage sets. In curiosity, the group approached a dark non-lit house and rang
the doorbell. No answer. They tried to peek into the window and noticed a large
Christmas tree surrounded by large presents. “Maybe this family left for a vacation…no
one’s around…” the boys assumed.
The next day, the boys came back to the same house in
the afternoon and watched as the neighbours pass by the house. “Let’s come back
tonight and see if the van is parked in the driveway,” Kyle commanded. Later
that night, approximately 11pm, the boys approached the house and still noticed
that the driveway was empty and the house remained unlit. Filled with
excitement, Kyle guaranteed the rest of his friends without a doubt that the
family who owns the house is on vacation. Kyle, then, gathered around his
friends Alan, Chris and Jason suggesting to break into the house and steal the
presents.
At 3AM, Chris drove his white van and pulled into the
driveway along with Jason, Kyle and Alan who wore dark clothing and masks. Kyle
rang the doorbell one more time to make sure that no one was home… no answer. All
4 boys, then, went to the backyard and threw a piece of stone to break the
glass window. As they broke in, they took all the presents under the Christmas
tree and also a laptop that was left in the living room. They ran out through
the front door with all the things they found, hopped into the van, and drove
away.
http://www.apartmentwiz.com/images/ houston_apartments_articles/when_a_burglary_will_occur.gif |
http://daigetssocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/burglar-thief-computer-burglary1.jpg |
What are the legal ramifications of this scenario?
In Canada, the crime of burglary is referred to as “breaking
and entering" or "B&E”. All four boys can be charged with the offence of
break and enter under s.348 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The offence of break and enter encompasses
situations where the accused was or attempted to trespass on private property
with an intent to commit an offence or actually committed the offence. Break and enter does not require any damage to
the property entered. All that is required is any entrance into the property by
even a part of one's body (s.350 of the Criminal Code of Canada). The key evidence for a conviction of such an offence is
circumstantial. For this reason, the identity of those charged as well as
evidence of possession of the stolen items are often important indicators. If
there was a neighbor or third party on the street who saw these boys, or if a
parent, friend, sibling finds the stolen goods or if one of the boys involved comes forward, it is
probable that the boys will be charged based on this evidence.
Importantly,
if you are charged with a crime after you turn 18, the YCJA is no longer applicable and you
will be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada. These four boys are over 17 years old, and
will be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada.
Legislation: Criminal Code of Canada
348. (1) Every one who
(a) breaks and enters a place with intent to commit an
indictable offence therein,
(b) breaks and enters a place and commits an
indictable offence therein, or
(c) breaks out of a place after
(i) committing an
indictable offence therein, or
(ii) entering the place
with intent to commit an indictable offence therein, is guilty
(d) if the offence is committed in relation to a
dwelling-house, of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life,
and
(e) if the
offence is committed in relation to a place other than a dwelling-house, of an
indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten
years or of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
350. For the purposes of
sections 348 and 349,
(a) a person enters as
soon as any part of his body or any part of an instrument that he uses is
within any thing that is being entered; and
(b) a person shall be
deemed to have broken and entered if
(i) he obtained entrance by a threat or an artifice or
by collusion with a person within, or
(ii) he entered without lawful justification
or excuse, the proof of which lies on him, by a permanent or temporary opening.
This blog scenario was written by Karen Jacobe, a volunteer on the JFCY's PLE Team. The legal content was written by Lauren Grossman, a first year law student at the University of Toronto who is volunteering at JFCY as the PLE team leader through her law school's Pro Bono Students Canada program. All legal content was reviewed by a JFCY lawyer.
No comments:
Post a Comment