Showing posts with label Youth Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Youth Crime. Show all posts

Friday, January 24, 2014

What Are Extrajudicial Measures and Sanctions?

The Youth Criminal Justice Act (“YCJA”) says it is better to deal with less serious offenses outside the court system. This is often the most appropriate and effective way to address non-violent youth crime.

EXTRAJUDICIAL MEASURES: are designed to hold young people responsible for wrongful behaviour without formally charging a youth with a criminal offence. The police can give warnings (informally), cautions (usually a letter sent to you and your parents and may require you and your parents to go into the police station to speak with an officer), or referrals to a community program. The crown attorney can also give a caution instead of a charge, or withdraw a charge and give a caution instead.

EXTRAJUDICIAL SANCTIONS: may be given by a Crown attorney before or after a young person has been charged with a criminal offence, as a way of dealing with the offending behaviour without proceeding further through the formal court system.  They may be used only if a warning, caution or referral is not enough to hold the young person responsible. The Crown can request an extrajudicial sanction and a referral to an extrajudicial sanction programs before or after the young person has been charged. If you are accepted into the program, you will be required to complete the program. This means you will get some consequences for your actions, but you will not go through the court system and be punished by a Judge.




http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/2/1/8/0/2/1/7/youth-arrests-64423613809.jpeg


You can get an extrajudicial sanction only if:
  • there is such a program where you live;
  • the police or the crown attorney thinks that the program is the right thing for you and for the interests of the community;
  • you are told all about the program and you freely agree to participate;
  • you have been given a chance to consult with a lawyer;
  • you are willing to accept responsibility for what the police say you have done wrong; and
  • there is a real case against you, and you could otherwise be brought to trial through the court system
There are a number of different options for an extrajudicial sanction program, some examples include: You may be asked to do some kind of community service, participate in a conference, write an essay or letter of apology, go to workshops, do a mediation, or perhaps do something else that would be relevant to you or the offence.

When you successfully complete the program, then any charge that has been laid against you will be dismissed and you will not have to return to court on this matter. Additionally, a record of your participation in the program will stay in the records of your local police for only 2 years. You will not get a youth justice court record. 


This blog post was written by Lauren Grossman, a first year law student at the University of Toronto who volunteered at JFCY through her law school’s Pro Bono Students Canada program in 2012/13. All legal content was reviewed by a JFCY lawyer. JFCY's legal content is based on the laws in Ontario relevant to youth under the age of 18. 

Thursday, January 10, 2013

What is the Youth Criminal Justice Act?


For those of you in search of an understanding of what exactly the YCJA is, or what it even stands for, you’ve come to the right place!
http://images.clipartof.com/small/226120-Royalty-Free-RF
-Clipart-Illustration-Of-A-Handcuffed-Man.jpg

Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) is the governing code in Canada for youth that came into effect in 2003. It covers the prosecution of your case if you are 12-17 years old at the time a criminal offence was committed. If you are charged after you turn 18, the YCJA is no longer applicable and you will be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada.

Youth Justice Court: In Canada, if you are between the ages of 12-17 at the time the crime was committed, your case will be tried at the Youth Justice Court.

Why does Canada have it? The YCJA focuses on:
  •  Helping to put young people who have committed crimes back into society,
  • Giving fair sentences consistent with the needs of young  people and their lower level of maturity,
  • Giving extra protection to young people, treating them fairly and respecting their right to privacy, and
  • Enforcing the law quickly to strengthen the link between the behaviour and its consequences. 
What if I am under 12 years old?
If you commit a crime and you are not 12 years old yet, the YCJA will not apply to you and you are not considered to be criminally responsible. Under Canadian law, persons under the age of 12 years cannot be said to form a criminal intent sufficient for criminal responsibility or a criminal record, if found guilty. The Criminal Code of Canada, section 13, states "No person shall be convicted of an offence in respect of an act or omission on his or her part while that person was under the age of twelve years." However, you may still face consequences, although not penal, for this behavior based on other laws, for example the Child and Family Services Act.
If I commit a crime, can I get a lawyer? If you are between the ages of 12-17 and have been charged with a crime, you do have a right to a lawyer.  Section 25 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act reads:
25.(1) A young person has the right to retain and instruct counsel without delay, and to exercise that right personally, at any stage of proceedings against the young person and before and during any consideration of whether, instead of starting or continuing judicial proceedings against the young person under this Act, to use an extrajudicial sanction to deal with the young person.
(2) Every young person who is arrested or detained shall, on being arrested or detained, be advised without delay by the arresting officer or the officer in charge, as the case may be, of the eight to retain and instruct counsel, and be given an opportunity to obtain counsel.
This means that youths who are arrested or detained for any reason must be told of their right and be given the opportunity to obtain a lawyer before any lawful procedures are conducted.
Will my parents find out if I commit a crime? 
Under section 26(1) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, the officer in charge of the arrest or detention of a youth must give notice to a parent either orally or in writing as soon as they possibly can.

Will my classmates find out if I commit a crime? 
Section 110 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act outlines privacy in relation to the identity of young offenders, access to their criminal records, and disclosure of their personal or trial information. Trial information can be published in media or print but identifying information (ie your name) about young offenders cannot be. 

To take a look at the Youth Criminal Justice Act, click here

For more information on YCJA and your rights as a youth, check out our legal information pamphlets: 

Know Your Rights: http://www.jfcy.org/ycj.html 


If you are a youth charged with a crime, you can call JFCY at 416.920.1633 or 1.866.999.5329 to speak with a lawyer.

This blog post was written by Lauren Grossman, a first-year law student at U of T who is volunteering at JFCY through her law school’s Pro Bono Students Canada program. All info was reviewed by a JFCY staff lawyer.


Friday, March 23, 2012

What does it mean to be charged with a crime?

In order for you to be charged with a crime in Canada, that behaviour has to be prohibited by a law. You can find most of the offences that young people are charged with in the Criminal Code, or in a related statute (for instance, if it is a drug offence, you might find it in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act).


Every crime has two elements—a prohibited act (or actus reus) and a criminal fault (or mens rea).


Actus Reus


The Actus Reus is pretty basic—the Criminal Code states that it is illegal to do a certain action, like steal another person’s things, or to fail to do a certain action, like provide the things your children need to live. The words that are used in the provision are really important to understanding what exactly is considered to be a crime.


For instance, when you think about robbery, you might think about a holdup of a convenience store. And that would definitely be a robbery. But the wording of the provision in the Criminal Code that prohibits robbery includes a lot more than that. For instance, under s. 343(C) of the Criminal Code, robbery also includes assaulting someone with the intent to steal from him or her. This means that you can be guilty of robbery even if you don’t actually steal anything, as long as you intend to steal something when you assault someone. And the Criminal Code defines assault broadly. It includes applying force in order to harm someone without their consent. It also includes making threats to apply force to someone, and impeding someone or begging while openly carrying a weapon. So you could be convicted of a robbery for making threats to harm someone, or begging or impeding someone while openly carrying a weapon (the prohibited action), as long as you have the intent to steal.


Mens Rea


This raises the second element of a criminal offence—the criminal fault, or mens rea. Sometimes, people call this the "guilty mind." The intent to threaten/hit and steal is the mens rea for robbery. The idea of the mens rea is that someone should not be found guilty of a crime if they don’t have the required level of fault. So, in the robbery example, you could not be convicted of robbery if you impeded someone while openly carrying a knife, when you did not also have the intent to steal. (But you could probably be convicted of assault).


Different crimes in the Criminal Code have different levels of fault associated with them. You might find them in the section—look for words like “intent,” “knowingly,” “for the purpose of”, “recklessly” or “negligently” for clues. Other times, however, the Court has decided the level of fault associated with a given crime while it is hearing a case.


So, when the Crown attorney (the government lawyer) goes to Court to prove someone committed a crime, they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person both committed the act and that they had the guilty intent. If they can’t prove both the act or the required level of intent, that person cannot be convicted or found guilty of that crime.


Want to understand the actus reus (prohibited action) and the mens rea (criminal intent) for other criminal offences?  You can look up the definition of an offence in the Criminal Code of Canada.


This post was written by Krista Nerland, a PLE Team Member and JFCY volunteer.  Krista is a first year law student at the University of Toronto. Legal info was reviewed by JFCY.

Monday, November 21, 2011

The Other Kids of 311 Jarvis


-by Niamh Harraher, Staff Lawyer and Jeffrey Rosekat, Chair of JFCY Board of Directors

The prevailing wind of federal government policy and much media discourse seems focused on presenting youth as dangerous, out of control and in need of a highly punitive justice system. David Bruser’s series on the kids of 311 Jarvis Street which ran over four days in the Toronto Star (Oct. 28-31) seems to have been blown by this wind. The articles painted a grim picture of a decaying courthouse and a system that is failing the public woefully. The portrayal was one-sided, but the sentiments expressed will undoubtedly resonate with many whose only experience with the youth criminal justice system is what they read in the newspapers. Those of us who work in the youth criminal justice system know there is a different story that needs to be told.

Mr. Bruser sat in 311 Jarvis Court for four months and during his time there saw some terrible cases of serious criminal misconduct by young people. He saw cases involving appalling violence; youth who have shown utter contempt for their fellow human beings through their actions. We learned some of the facts of those terrible cases through his articles and he reminded us that young people need to be held accountable in a meaningful way for what they have done. Serious crimes should invite serious consequences. The public needs to be kept safe.

But are those cases really representative of the vast goings on at that Court? The simple answer is that they are not. Mr. Bruser gave us his opinion on some of the things he saw during the four months he observed some of the workings of 311 Jarvis. The articles did not tell us about the far less serious crimes which represent the majority of crimes prosecuted at 311 Jarvis and the consequences to those young people involved. He did not talk about the programs that are offered often with great success to rehabilitate young offenders. He does not talk about the judges’ expertise in dealing with young people.

As any parent of a teenager can tell you, young people can be sullen and disrespectful. They do things they are supposed to and they sometimes lie. In this respect they are not unlike many adults. They are different, however, in the way they make decisions, assess risk and weigh consequences. Teenagers--almost all teenagers--make some unwise choices. Choices that if exposed to the full glare of the law could have easily resulted in criminal sanctions. Whether those choices involve, underage consumption of alcohol or illegal drugs, taking a car without permission, or getting into a fight most teenagers engage in unlawful behaviour. Few adults can truthfully say they escaped their teenage years without breaking the law in some way.

The youthful marijuana smokers or shoplifters barely get a mention in Mr. Bruser’s series. Mr. Bruser did not mention the shoplifter who writes a letter of apology to the store, completes an anti-theft program and has his charges withdrawn or the school yard brawler who sits across from the person she punched in the face in a restorative justice circle. These stories do not make for sensational headlines or melodramatic stories in the same way as committing a rape, dealing crack cocaine, or being involved in a gang might. But they are great stories all the same, and are stories that need to be told.

These are the stories of 311 Jarvis which should be told, because they are by far the majority of the youth who walk through the door. According to the federal government’s own statistics, over 71% of young people charged with criminal offences in 2009 were charged with property-related or other non-violent offences. These youth of 311 Jarvis frequently stand in front of Justices of the Peace on their first appearance with their heads bowed. They are ashamed and scared. If they giggle it is not out of defiance but from nervousness. Their families are upset, their lives are disrupted by court appearances and bail conditions. A young person who gets into a fist fight at school and is charged with assault is not allowed to return to that same school until the case is over because of the standard bail conditions. Before the Court even gets to them they have had their day-to-day lives completely changed. Many of the youth of 311 Jarvis want nothing more than to put their youthful transgressions behind them and move on. And large numbers of them do.

The majority of young people who have contact with Canada's youth courts are one-time offenders, according to a study jointly conducted by the University of Waterloo and the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics at Statistics Canada. The study traced the criminal "careers" of 59,000 young people released in 2005. The study found that the majority of these young people were referred to court on only one occasion, shattering the notion that most youth who come into contact with courts become chronic offenders.

One thing Mr. Bruser did get right is that, more often than not, the kids of 311 Jarvis come from communities that are racialized, poor and have a large police presence. They are therefore much more likely to come into contact with the police and to get caught when they offend. The kids of 311 Jarvis are not, for the most part, the kids of Forest Hill, Rosedale, Lawrence Park, Leaside or the Annex. These kids and the crimes they commit reflect the growing economic inequality of our city. Once in a while one will see a young person from the “right side of the tracks”  at 311 Jarvis--dressed in a suit and with a lawyer paid for by their parents--but this is not the norm. Children of affluence are simply not policed in the same manner, and they therefore do not end up in conflict with the law in the same way as their poorer and more heavily policed peers.
 
Whether we like it or not, the time when a young person comes into conflict with the law, whether for a serious or less serious crime, gives us an opportunity to make sure that this is the one and only time in their lives that it happens. The alternative, advocated by Mr. Bruser, is simply to lock them up and throw away the key, write them off and forget about them.  This is a very expensive and largely ineffective solution. With the rarest of exceptions, youth placed into custodial sentences will one day be back in the ranks of society with the only difference being that they are now hardened by the time they spent in custody.

Mr. Bruser’s articles also missed the fact that young people, even the ones who have transgressed in fairly significant ways, can be and are often rehabilitated with the right type of response. For instance, the story of a seventeen year old who repeatedly stole from his employer. Upon being charged with theft he was kicked out of his parents’ home and slept on his friend’s couch for a year. Between the time he was charged and the time he received his sentence he changed his life entirely. He got two new jobs, got himself into drug counselling regarding marijuana, volunteered twice a week at the hospital, maintained good attendance at school and got involved in extracurricular activities. He pleaded guilty on the basis of a joint submission between the Crown and his defense lawyer and received a conditional discharge which included terms that he continue along the path he had laid, and required that he pay restitution. A year later, he has his own apartment, is working and is about to start college.

In short, it is not uncommon for people to offend in their youth and never do it again as an adult. Many kids change. They grow up, and they learn from their mistakes.

Indisputably, some of the kids of 311 Jarvis are dangerous, embedded in a life of crime and well on their way to the adult penitentiary. Attempts to rehabilitate them are failing. These are the kids we hear about all the time. These are the kids that make great sensational stories for the media, and these are the kids that feed public outrage.

The judges, prosecutors, and defence lawyers at 311 Jarvis work very hard to make sure that kids who make mistakes both understand the serious nature of those mistakes, and get a chance to make amends and change their lives for the better. And while the culture of fear will always prefer the sensational minority to the boring minority, the fact is that 311 Jarvis and Canada’s youth criminal justice system, while undoubtedly imperfect, does work.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Reel Youth: Burnaby Youth Custody Centre

A shout out to our young brothers and sisters in BC!  Check out these amazing videos that were made by and about youth in custody at the Burnaby Youth Custody Centre. The videos masterfully illustrate the complexities around youth justice and youth criminality, told from the perspective of the youths themselves.  Awesome!

Congratulations to these inspiring young people for producing thoughtful and inspiring work!

http://reelyouth.ca/custody.html