This blog post is a continuation from our post on
September 21, 2012.
| Comic made by PLE Team volunteer Shawn Malik | 
What can kids and teens do if they experience age-based discrimination in Ontario?
Unfortunately, not much...unless they up for a Charter challenge to the Ontario Human Rights Code.
As the law in Ontario 
The law means that people under age 18 cannot succeed
in making an application under the Ontario 
There are various scenarios when young people
experience age discrimination in Canadian society.  
Here are a few examples:
q      
Gyms
and fitness facilities in condos, apartments and hotels that refuse entry to
people under age 16.
q      
Retail
stores that only allow in two youth at one time.
q      
Security
guards and police officers who follow around youth, or otherwise unfairly
monitor them, solely because of their age.
While young people are not protected from age-based
discrimination by the Human Rights Code,
the story does not end there.  This is
because the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms protects everyone, regardless
of how young, from age-based discrimination that is created by our laws or
government actors.  This means that laws
made by the Federal, Provincial or Municipal government must NOT discriminate
based on age.  
JFCY holds the opinion that the Ontario Human Rights Code violates the Charter because its definition of age
discriminates against people under the age of 18. The
definition of age in the Ontario Human
Rights Code creates a clear distinction between those under age 18 and
those over age 18, such that only those over age 18 are protected from
age-based discrimination under the Code.
The Code stereotypes, excludes, and devalues people under age 18. It assumes that people under
age 18 are either not ever subject to, or not worthy of protection from
age-based discrimination. Or, it places protection of children from other harms
above protecting them from age-based discrimination, but is not responsive to
individual circumstances where that may not be in a child’s best interest. 
JFCY agrees that for reasons of safety
and well-being, there are some distinctions that should be made between adults
and children.  For example, it is
reasonable for an employer to refuse to hire a seven-year old for a job, and for
teens to be made to wait until a certain age to get their drivers license.
However, the magic age should not be 18 for age-based protection from
discrimination.  The definition of age in
the Ontario Human Rights Code is not based
on informed generalizations about children’s capacities, circumstances and
needs. The definition of age in the Code
is not effective in meeting the actual needs of claimants under age 18 and
achieving the objective of the legislation, which is to prevent discrimination
in society.
 JFCY supports some specific
age-based protections to be carved into the Ontario
Human Rights Code that seek to reasonably protect children in rationally
necessary areas of life, as well as acknowledge that some types of discrimination
should not be actionable.  Otherwise, all
other age-based discrimination must be assessed on the test of whether there is
a “bona fide and reasonable justification” (ie a good, sensible reason to
discriminate).
There have been some Human Rights Tribunal cases
dealing with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Code in this context, but these cases
are not “binding”.  There is a need for
more cases to be brought forward on this issue in order to push for a change to
this law. We see a specific need for cases that deal with age-based
discrimination faced by youth and teens under age 18.  JFCY is up for this challenge and welcomes
the opportunity to assist young people who believe they have experienced
age-based discrimination in Ontario 
If you are under age 18 and live in Ontario 
To read a case that successfully challenged the
definition of age in the Ontario Human
Rights Code, click here.
This post was written by a JFCY staff lawyer.
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment